Our premium NCAAB predictions and picks are driven by computer models that analyze millions of data points.
We use a variety of statistical techniques to predict games, including decision trees, similarity scores, and power ratings.
We publish a game winner, point spread, over/under and money line value pick for all NCAAB games, plus win odds for each pick.
Finally, we provide full transparency with our prediction accuracy reports, which track our historical pick performance.
From 2007-2018, our 3-star rated NCAAB over/under picks were 1441-1173-24 against game-day lines from Pinnacle Sports (a 55.1% winning percentage over 2,500+ picks), including 236-168-2 (58.4%) in 2017-18.
The picks below represent our most recent opinions based on current betting lines, the results of our computer prediction models, and analysis of other relevant game information. We assign each “TR Pick” an overall confidence rating of 1 to 5 stars. Picks are subject to change until game time based on new information, and we before using this information we strongly encourage all users to read more about our methods:
|Day||Status||TR Pick||Opp/Game||Confidence||Odds||Similar Games||Decision Tree||Power Rating|
|11/11||Right||N Dakota St||vs Cal Poly||94.1%||NDSU 90.5%||NDSU 78.2%||NDSU 84.9%|
|11/11||Right||Cincinnati||vs Drake||88.1%||CIN 88.4%||CIN 59.5%||CIN 76.8%|
|11/11||Right||Bowling Grn||vs Jacksonville||82.6%||BGSU 75.7%||BGSU 58.8%||BGSU 81.9%|
|11/11||Wrong||Towson||vs Kent State||54.4%||KENT 65.3%||TOWS 66.6%||KENT 60.0%|
|11/11||Right||Dartmouth||vs Fla Gulf Cst||76.0%||DART 78.0%||DART 74.6%||DART 80.2%|
|11/11||Wrong||GA Southern||at N Florida||64.7%||GASO 61.8%||GASO 55.7%||GASO 66.6%|
|11/11||Right||NC Central||vs SC Upstate||72.5%||NCCU 70.2%||NCCU 78.5%||NCCU 67.2%|
|11/11||Wrong||VA Military||vs Presbyterian||64.3%||VMI 52.6%||PRE 52.5%||PRE 64.5%|
|11/11||Right||Mercer||vs Kennesaw St||86.3%||MER 71.2%||MER 85.3%||MER 85.2%|
|11/11||Right||GA Tech||vs Elon||98.3%||GT 96.5%||GT 73.9%||GT 87.4%|
|11/11||Right||Belmont||vs Samford||82.9%||BEL 94.1%||BEL 76.9%||BEL 82.7%|
|11/11||Wrong||Iowa||vs DePaul||80.4%||IOWA 85.5%||IOWA 81.7%||IOWA 73.8%|
|11/11||Right||UAB||vs Alab A&M||98.4%||UAB 91.2%||UAB 89.6%||UAB 94.4%|
|11/11||Right||Alabama||vs Fla Atlantic||89.4%||ALA 85.7%||ALA 76.2%||ALA 81.1%|
|11/11||Right||Texas A&M||vs LA Monroe||92.2%||TAM 93.8%||TAM 85.5%||TAM 80.9%|
|11/11||Right||Vanderbilt||vs TX A&M-CC||95.7%||VAN 92.1%||VAN 86.2%||VAN 87.0%|
|11/11||Right||Neb Omaha||vs Beth-Cook||81.9%||NEOM 80.3%||NEOM 78.3%||NEOM 84.8%|
|11/11||Right||San Fransco||vs Yale||66.0%||SF 60.6%||SF 69.1%||SF 61.1%|
|11/11||Wrong||St Marys||vs Winthrop||96.8%||SMC 90.6%||SMC 78.5%||SMC 85.1%|
|11/11||Right||South Dakota||vs Florida A&M||95.9%||SDAK 97.6%||SDAK 65.7%||SDAK 86.1%|
|11/11||Right||Hawaii||vs Pacific||61.4%||HAW 72.7%||HAW 65.9%||HAW 60.5%|
Printed from TeamRankings.com - © 2005-2019 Team Rankings, LLC. All Rights Reserved.